Change language to englishChange language to german

Forums

Subscribe to Recent Posts 0 topic(s), 0 post(s)

  Forum Last Post
Comment INTRODUCTION TO "VINTAGE NEWS & GENERAL WEIRDNESS"
0 topics, 0 posts

Whether its historical, topical, humorous, political, or just plain freaky/weird, you shall see it here. Whether its a straight story or article, op-ed, commentary or macabre, snide humor, this is the place to park it. Legal issues, as they apply to “us,” shall also be explored and detailed in “plain vanilla envelope” language for all to enjoy.

A review of “Deep Throat”— The attached material gives deep background on the history of this piece. However, this brought “legitimacy” to mainstream porn. Taking it out of the quarter movie and peep booths, and slamming it into the faces of the Bible thumpers and “moral majority,” which, as we all know, is neither.

Thanks to Linda Lovelace, Marilyn Chambers, and the pioneer herself, one Bettie Page, porn climbed from the gutter to the padded theatre seats. “Deep Throat” and “Behind the Green Door,” made adult fare something that was shown in the same vein as “Bambi Goes Down For A Buck.”

As this site showcases the vintage, shorts and vignettes of fetish, kink and porn, it also relates histrionics of things B.C. (before computers.) Back in the day, everything started in San Francisco, worked its way down to Los Angeles, then took an express train to New York City.

Google “Seka.” This was a blonde Swedish Actress, with a series of silent reels of her in action overseas. In cities across America, family movie theatres were dying. Whether indoors or drive-ins, shopping malls were the craze during the 70’s—80’s, absorbing the conventional theatre motiffes.

Marketing gurus deduced that if several dozen retailers, under one roof, were banging away for 12-14 hours a day, seven days a week, here was an oasis for not only movie theatres, but “multi-plexes.” The free-standing fossils were now converted into “adults only” fare.

Once the movies debuted in the largest markets, owners ran multiple reels and sent them to these smut parlors for all to see. This really augmented the burlesque houses, adding diversity to the roster, and keeping them open longer, before they ultimately died due to rezoning regulations in respective communities.

Newly released FBI files show agents across the country and at the highest level of the agency investigated “Deep Throat” — the 1972 porn movie, not the shadowy Watergate figure — in a vain attempt to roll back what became a cultural shift toward more permissive entertainment.
The documents released to The Associated Press show the expanse of agents’ investigation into the film: seizing copies of the movie, having negatives analyzed in labs and interviewing everyone from actors and producers to messengers who delivered reels to theaters.

All of it in a failed attempt to stop the spread of a movie that some saw as the victory of a cultural and sexual revolution and others saw as simply decadent.

“Today we can’t imagine authorities at any level of government — local, state or federal — being involved in obscenity prosecutions of this kind,” said Mark Weiner, a constitutional law professor and legal historian at Rutgers-Newark School of Law. “The story of ‘Deep Throat’ is the story of the last gasp of the forces lined up against the cultural and sexual revolution and it is the advent of the entry of pornography into the mainstream.”

The papers are among 498 pages from the FBI file on Gerard Damiano, who directed the movie and died in October. Released this month following a Freedom of Information Act request by the AP, they are just a glimpse into Damiano’s roughly 4,800-page file. More than 1,000 additional pages were withheld under FOIA exemptions and because they duplicated other material; the balance of the file has not yet been reviewed and released.

Many parts of the released files are whited out and the FBI’s ultimate targets are unclear, but the seriousness with which the agency treated the investigation is unquestionable.

Authorities have long said the movie was made with mafia money — and the FBI has linked the mob with porn over the years — but the file includes no mention of mob links.

The file includes memos between the FBI’s top men — L. Patrick Gray, William Ruckelshaus and Clarence Kelley, successive heads of the agency after J. Edgar Hoover — and field offices so widespread, it seemed nearly all of the country’s biggest cities were involved.

While much of the probe centered in New York, where many involved in the film lived, and Miami, where it was largely shot, agents from Honolulu to Detroit were involved.

On various entries in the file, a checklist of top FBI brass appears in the top right corner, with initials next to some names. One of those listed is W. Mark Felt, the FBI second-in-command whose “Deep Throat” alias as a Watergate informant came from the movie’s title. However, none of the markings indicate he read any of the materials on the movie whose name became synonymous with his role in bringing down Richard Nixon’s presidency.

Felt got the double-entendre nickname because he leaked crucial information about Nixon administration corruption on “deep background” to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward. His identity remained a secret until 2005. He died in December.

Aside from investigative records tracking subpoenas, interviews, screenings and shipments of the film, the Damiano file includes various FBI agents’ play-by-play accounts of the movie’s plot, and the specific role of Damiano in the agency’s investigation.

The FBI notes Damiano had been “somewhat cooperative,” On Aug. 7, 1973, an assistant U.S. attorney general writes to Kelley, saying Damiano is being considered for immunity. The memo doesn’t specify the crime, though mentioned throughout the file is the charge of interstate transportation of obscene material.

Among the areas of the case file whited out is an interview with the star of the film, who at the time went by the name Linda Lovelace.

“Deep Throat” achieved fame unlike any pornographic film in history and become the most widely known adult film to reach a general audience. It was hugely profitable — made for about $25,000 and amassing hundreds of millions in receipts — and became a cultural buzzword.

Officials at every level of government tried to stop screenings and obscenity trials continued for years. But in the end, experts say, it represents the end of an era in which the government sought to stop the changing cultural tides.

Eugene Volokh, a law professor at UCLA, said the oddity of the scope of the investigation into “Deep Throat” is a reflection of very different times.

“Certainly today, with our broadly socially less restrictive attitude to most pornography and to sex more broadly it may seem odd that the government was spending so much effort on something like this,” he said. “But attitudes back then were much different.”

Comment DAMNED IF YOU DO....DAMNED IF YOU DON'T
0 topics, 0 posts

(Legal Analysis)

The article below, which we predict will be upheld and formally enacted in the USA, is one of the most difficult to weigh and balance. That blind woman, with those scales, has her work cut out for her on this one.

Certainly, protecting those who are defenseless from monsters, predators and other vicious animals, mistakenly called human beings, is a praiseworthy goal.

“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few…..or the one.” “The rights of the many far outweigh the needs of the few…..or the one.” Certainly, that flies in the face of individual liberties and individual human rights, allegedly guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

However, a paltry few would disagree with the intent and scope of what this case is designed to protect. No means no and those who are legally and physically unable to give consent, must be protected from the lifetime terror these sub-human species inflict.

However, based on the premise that human beings are inherently bad, not good, this decision, like other landmark cases, will be perverted by those in charge to suit their own agendas. Those agendas do not include the faces of the victims, but rather, the billboards of campaign slogans, fear mongering and creating more special interest groups, to further their special interests. Cha-ching.

Example— Before these people are indefinitely committed, they are guaranteed the right of due process of law. In a nutshell, that is the state bringing aggravating circumstances as to why he, or she, should remained confined, and the accused presenting mitigating circumstances as to why they should be released back into the general population.

Flash back to Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy, two of the most heinous, notorious, serial/sex killers in American history. When interviewed, both of them used “porn made me do it.” Not just chocolate and vanilla porn, but S & M porn. Not just the latter in general, but the latter in specifics——“depicting demeaning, degrading, or vulgar acts, perpetrated upon women, solely used for prurient interests.”

(Perpetrated by men upon women, btw.)—- Used as a providential epiphany by Hillary and Tipper (warning labels on song lyrics) there are certain “invisible caveats” that are on the books today. As government grows, this demon tree will also be a convenient campaign issue for some hypocritical zealot, seizing the outrage and fear factor to garner votes.

Ergo, unbeknownst to those in the internet bizz today—Depictions and scenes of BDSM and their fetish offshoots, are LEGAL IF ITS A WOMAN WHIPPING AND FLOGGING A MAN. Legal if its a woman doing likewise to another female. However, if its a man doing the giving and the woman doing the receiving, THAT IS ILLEGAL. You won’t see that in any lawbooks.

The types of atrocities under discussion below, according to the leeches and ospreys, who make public policy, shall allow them to legally prosecute those who “supply the images of violence and abuse against women…..thereby supplying the nexus required to sustain a custody of evidence, and at the very least, a trial. In other words, the vehicle and the driver are equally culpable.

You are seeing it now with gun control, tobacco, drugs, health care, immigration, and a host of other hot-button issues. Closer to the discussion at bar—-Craig’s List. Those of internet persuasions are well aware what is going on here. You Tube, Facebook, Twitter, Tag and the others shall also come under scrutiny. And how many other social networking sites, adult and otherwise, will now be put under the microscope?

For those who originate outside of USA jurisdiction, you are safe, for now. Until, or unless, the policeman of the world decides to blackmail your country into co-operating with America’s way of thinking. Just line up the shrinks, give them millions in federal funding, and they will sing any tune the government tells them to. (BTW—The scientific community DOES NOT RECOGNIZE the causation discussed above)— Never let the facts stand in the way of a good conviction—-when suppostion and opinion become the de facto source of lawmaking, we’re all in trouble.

Our posture is this——”If government, prosecutors and law enforcement could be trusted to always do the right thing………we never would have needed a Bill of Rights."

Anytime the government gets a new policy or enforcement tool to bludgeon down upon their minions, they will ALWAYS, ALWAYS PERVERT AND ABUSE IT FOR THEIR OWN ENDS.

Is this case, protection of life, safety of the citizenry, and insuring the well-being of every man, woman and child, must always be top priority, irrespective of the arena or venue.

But when somebody is merely a chronic masturbator, kink or fetish freak, and is a consumer, not an actor, they are going to be treated exactly the same way of what is at bar below. Some mindless, sieve-brained jack-off will be mentioned in the same breath as O.J., John Wayne Gacy or Arthur Shorecross.

“When you read the sports page, you see man’s accomplishments…….when you read the front page, you see man’s failures.”



The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday that it would decide whether Congress may adopt a federal law that keeps sex offenders in custody indefinitely after they complete their prison sentences.
The high court agreed to hear an Obama administration appeal seeking to reinstate a 2006 law providing for the continued detention of “sexually dangerous” convicted federal inmates who have served their prison terms.

A U.S. appeals court based in Virginia struck down the law for exceeding the limits of congressional authority and intruding on police powers, the Constitution reserves for the states, many of which have similar laws.

The law had been challenged by five inmates who had been kept in custody at a federal prison hospital in North Carolina after their sentences ended.

The U.S. Justice Department said a total of 95 inmates have been identified as possible candidates for post-sentence detention under the law.

In 1997, the Supreme Court ruled the states could confine dangerous sex offenders to mental institutions after they serve their sentences.

Many state laws provide for the commitment under civil law of mentally ill sex offenders who pose a risk of committing more crimes involving children if released into the community.

The federal law defined “sexually dangerous” as someone who suffers from a serious mental illness, abnormality or disorder and would have difficulty in refraining from sexually violent conduct or child molestation, if released.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments and issue its ruling in the case during its upcoming term that begins in October

Recent posts